Top News

New Delhi: The Patiala House Court on Wednesday asked Delhi Police to present CCTV footage and other evidence related to the BMW accident in Dhaula Kuan. The court has also requested the defense counsel and government lawyer to submit written arguments. The court is hearing the bail plea of ​​accused driver Gaganpreet Kaur.

What argument did the lawyer of accused Gaganpreet Kaur give…

Judicial Magistrate First Class (JMFC) Ankit Garg, after hearing the arguments of the accused's lawyer, Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) for Delhi and the complainant's lawyer, directed the Delhi Police to present CCTV footage and other related evidence and decided the hearing of the case for 2 pm on Thursday. Initially, Advocate Pradeep Rana, the lawyer of accused Gaganpreet Kaur, argued that the accused Gaganpreet Kaur had no wrong intention. He called at Venkateswara Hospital, but did not get any reply to the call. He also called PCR.

Counsel for the accused said- Why was FIR filed late

The lawyer said that Gaganpreet Kaur took the injured to NewLiff Hospital and called her father and asked her to arrange all the necessary things for the treatment of the injured Navjot Singh and his wife. The lawyer of the accused questioned, "The FIR was registered with a delay of 10 hours. Why did the police take so much time to register an FIR?" A PCR call was made at 1.38–1.39 on the day of the incident. The lawyer said that the intention of the accused is being misunderstood. He is not a doctor and he did not know how long the patient could have to live. Advocate Pradeep Rana argued that this is not a case of non-hilt.

The lawyer said, "She is not asking for anticipatory bail; she has been in custody for 10 days since her arrest. There is no danger of her escape; she supported the investigation. When asked for her mobile and drive was handed over to the police. The whole family is suffering, and all the evidence is with the police. He can be granted bail. '

What did the victim's family say anything…

Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Atul Srivastava opposed the bail plea with Additional Public Prosecutor Disknak Dhawan, saying that AIIMS hospital is near the house of the accused, while NewLife Hospital is far away. It is the principle of 'Golden Hour' to reach the hospital and provide medical treatment at the earliest. While arguing, he opposed the bail plea that the documents prepared by the hospital did not mention any particular time.

The SPP of the Delhi Police argued that the intention of the accused was not to inform the police about the incident. The caller from the hospital told the police that one patient had died and one was injured. Help needs. The accused had been living in South Delhi for 6 years and was well aware of that area and hospitals there. The intention of the accused was not to save the injured, but to protect himself from legal proceedings. He has already tampered with the evidence by taking the injured to his relatives' hospital. This is not a case of granting bail to the accused.

Court said- release CCTV footage

The SPP also mentioned that the witness Gulfam said that the accused had asked him to take him towards Azadpur. In response to a court question, the investigating officer informed the court that a notice has been issued to BMW requesting a crash report to find out the speed of the car.
The court has asked the accused's lawyer and police to file a written document and CCTV footage etc. yesterday.

The complainant's counsel, Advocate Atul Kumar argued that the injured were placed on a stretcher in the hospital's lobby for hours. On the other hand, the accused was admitted to the ICU. There is an army base hospital 2 minutes from the accident site. The complainant's counsel argued that the legal need is to take the injured to the nearest hospital. The victim said that she was taken to a distant hospital. Despite this, he requested that he be taken to the nearest hospital.