Top News

of 29 municipal corporations in Maharashtra civic elections The State Election Commission (SEC) has given a clear warning to the voters that if any person indelible ink If he tries to erase will not be able to vote again and such efforts electoral malpractice Will be considered. The purpose of this warning is to maintain the fairness and democratic integrity of the election process.

The ink mark placed after voting indicates that the person has already cast his vote. The Election Commission has clarified that Voting records are maintained even if the ink is erasedwhereby any person Cannot vote second time. organized effort to remove ink Voter confusion activity It will be considered and legal action will be taken against the person concerned.

Transparency and security in the election process

The State Election Commission has also stated that The method of ink application and record keeping is constitutionally protected.and the objective behind this is to ensure that No person can vote more than once. The Commission has instructed all the polling personnel for this be careful Has given instructions and urged to strictly follow the election standards.

Controversy and political reactions

during elections ink removal something about Political statements and criticisms Issues have also come to light, in which disgruntled voters are expressing concern that the ink applied with a marker pen can easily be removed from the hand. Critics say that this Questions arise on voter security system. However, the Election Commission has refuted these allegations and said that Re-voting impossible even if ink is removed and security measures are already in place.