Top News

According to one royal biographer and historian who knew the former Prince Andrew, removing him from the line of succession is "pointless". Andrew Lownie told TalkTV host Julia Hartley-Brewer that it is a "complete gesture of politics" to start parliamentary proceedings to remove Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor, who is eighth in line to the throne.

Julia began the discussion by asking: "What do you make of the moves we have had, the Australians and now the New Zealand governments saying they would back a call - we're looking at this being many years down the line, realistically, if there is any police action - for an act of Parliament which would take Andrew out of the line of succession?

"[He's] currently eighth in the line of succession after William and his children, then Harry and his children.

"Is that really necessary and is that a rather more complicated affair than many people think, especially with Caribbean nations who have been looking at [not] having the King as the head of state and perhaps asking for something in return?"

Lownie responded: "It's a complete gesture of politics, it's completely pointless. I mean, it serves no purpose.

Ensure our latest showbiz headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activate or add us as a Preferred Source in your Google search settings.

"He's not going to become king, he's not going to be a councillor of state and the Royal Family wouldn't want a parliamentary debate about that in any case.

"I think the focus has to be on accountability from the Royal Family and justice served for the [alleged] victims against Andrew."

Andrew has always denied all allegations of wrongdoing. He was released by police after his arrest last week under investigation.