Top News

Kemi Badenhoch gave a tub-thumping speech this week about what the Tories would do if they got into power. It was impressive. She also made a dig at the boob whisperer Polanski, and she accused Starmer of sucking up to the Muslims to get votes. She also got behind her Justice Secretary Nick Timothy who was being slated by the Left for saying that mass prayer assemblies of Muslims in public places - like the one in Trafalgar Square earlier this week - are "an act of domination".

Starmer has gone apoplectic and demanded he resign. But why? Muslims - specifically Islamists - make no secret of the fact they want Islam to dominate. They say there is no God - only Allah. And of course, they can say what they like in their own mosques - but not in public places shared by us all. As Timothy said: "The domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook. It is an act of domination therefore division."

And why is it that someone preaching Christianity on our streets gets moved on by police for being divisive. Jews wearing skull caps get told they're being provocative, yet Muslims can assemble en masse to pray, and no one's supposed to say a word?

As for the hypocrite Starmer, he actually pulled out of an event in 2021 organised by the controversial Ramadan Tent project (which organised the Trafalgar Square event) after offensive comments made by its chief executive because, as Kemi pointed out, back then he was sucking up to Jews to pretend Labour had changed!

I've just watched the fabulous new Channel 4 series A Women of Substance starring Brenda Belthyn, which is a remake of the Barbara Taylor Bradford novel. But why have they changed the name of one of the major characters, Blackie O'Neill - a lifelong friend of the heroine Emma Harte - to plain old Mac?

We surely can't be changing the names of book characters now for fear of offending the terminally offended woke mob?

Teachers might be in the wrong job

More than a third of teachers say the reading crisis can't be solved blaming too much screen time and unsupportive parents. Er no, it's a teacher's job to teach kids the Three Rs. And if they can't, what's the point of them? Any teacher who says they can't entice children into the magical, wonderful world of reading really is in the wrong job.

No amount of money is worth a three-day retreat with Meghan

So, it's £1,400 to spend an evening with Meghan at a three-day women's only retreat. Sorry, but I'd want more than that.

Wait for the Hot Cross Bun ban

Okay, Easter's approaching and I'm just waiting for the announcement that Hot Cross buns have been banned - because they're offensive to Muslims.

Polanski's past is catching up

Zack Polanski's dodgy past is fast catching up with him. A new poll says a third of adults who'd been thinking of voting for the Greens have been put off by the fact he used to hypnotise women to 'think their breasts bigger'.

Polanski has repeatedly said he was misrepresented by the newspaper who wrote that story and he'd never believed it was possible. He even claimed he'd done a BBC interview the day after the story appeared to say sorry.

Weird then that the BBC have no record of this interview. However, Polanski did do an interview six days later with Radio Humberside where he reiterated his assertion that he COULD help women 'think their breasts bigger'. "The evidence is growing," he said. So, there you go - not just a chancer and a charlatan but a liar as well.

Kim's glorious in Debenhams

You've got to hand it to Kim Cattrall. She left Sex and the City because of the controlling Sarah Jessica Parker - even though she's a better actress than SJP. She turned down a lucrative part in the SATC spin off. She's done a whole host of other jobs including low paid theatre for the simple reason she loves acting. Now at 69 having modelled for Fendi and Chanel, she's strutting her stuff for Debenhams.

You've got to love a woman who loves to work!

Wrecker Reeves always needs someone to blame

There's only one reason 'Wrecker' Reeves wants closer ties with the EU and that's because she doesn't have clue how to fix the economy SHE'S wrecked and she thinks, if she runs back into the arms of the EU, she can blame them when it all goes wrong which it will because they're all as useless as she is.

Rayner has one benefit - making David Lammy look bright

Angela Rayner - setting out her stall to be PM even though she has no government job and had to resign for dodging £40,000 stamp duty - reckons it's very un-British to change migrants' rights to stay here and collect benefits (1.3 million of them already do) because it will affect their hard-working families.

I'd be more interested in what she had to say if she was talking about the rights of hard-working British families who are having to pay billions every year for migrants, many of whom shouldn't even be here. And is no one going to say this - Rayner's just not bright enough to be PM. She makes David Lammy look like an intellectual.