Listen to this article in summarized format
Loading...
××
Subscribe to
Unlock AI Briefing and Premium Content
New Year Offer 24 Hours Left
Subscribe NowAlready a member? Sign In
What's Included
- Exclusive Stories
- Daily ePaper Access
- Smart Market Tools
- Curated Investment Ideas
- Ad-lite Experience
Subscription
A single sentence, delivered without drama at the workplace, can quietly dismantle the ego built over degrees, designations, and years of effort. For many high achievers, identity becomes tightly stitched to job titles and recognition. But sometimes, the most uncomfortable truth is also the one that sets someone free.
Siddharth Maheshwari took to social media and shared a deeply reflective note about a defining moment in his professional journey. He wrote that at 34, while serving as an Assistant Vice President (AVP) and a graduate of top-notch educational institutions like IIT and ISB, he once heard his boss say, “You are replaceable.” In that moment, his first reaction was anger and disbelief. He questioned how someone with such academic credentials and professional standing could be viewed through such a lens after giving so much to the organisation.
Second reaction
But his second reaction came three days later. The same statement began to shift in meaning. What initially felt like an insult gradually turned into clarity. He described it as one of the most freeing realisations of his career, not because it diminished his value, but because it removed a psychological weight that many professionals unknowingly carry.
He explained that one of the uncomfortable truths in any career is that organisations continue to function regardless of individual presence. A company exists before an employee joins and continues long after they leave. This is not a cynical observation in his view, but a structural reality of how workplaces operate. Recognising this helps separate personal worth from organisational roles.
Loyalty not tied to growth
He also reflected on how loyalty, when not tied to growth, can quietly become a liability. Staying in a role purely out of commitment, without personal development, can create what he described as a hidden cost over time. In such situations, loyalty does not necessarily translate into progress and instead may slow down professional evolution.
Identity based on job titles
Another key point he highlighted was the fragile nature of job-based identity. Titles such as AVP or any other designation can change overnight due to restructuring or organisational shifts. When that happens, the question becomes not just about career position, but about self-definition beyond the role itself. For him, this realisation helped decouple identity from designation.
Hard work= indispensable?
He also challenged a common assumption in workplaces that working harder automatically makes someone indispensable. In his reflection, consistent high performance often leads to increased responsibility rather than exclusivity or immunity. Reliable professionals are trusted with more work, but that does not always translate into being irreplaceable or significantly better rewarded.
Replacement is natural
He further pointed out that every replacement in a role eventually performs adequately, which reinforces the idea that job functions are designed to be transferable. This, he noted, is not personal criticism but simply how systems are structured in business environments.
How he shifted his mindset
From these realisations, he outlined the shift in mindset that followed. Instead of performing loyalty, he began prioritising personal and professional growth. Each role began to be evaluated based on whether it contributed to development rather than comfort or familiarity. If growth was absent, he felt more comfortable moving on without emotional hesitation.
Building skills
He also began focusing on building skills that were independent of any single organisation. The emphasis shifted to creating capabilities that would remain relevant even if job titles or companies changed. Alongside this, he started detaching his identity from his job role, viewing work as an important chapter rather than the entire story.
Accepting replaceability
This shift also changed how he approached negotiations and workplace dynamics. Accepting replaceability, in his view, also brought awareness that organisations themselves operate in competitive environments. This perspective allowed him to engage in professional discussions with more confidence and less fear.
He concluded that many high achievers operate under an unspoken fear of being replaceable, regardless of whether they come from IIT, ISB, or any prestigious background. Once that fear is acknowledged and accepted, its influence begins to weaken. What remains is a clearer focus on growth, autonomy, and long-term self-directed career building, rather than validation through titles alone.
Assembly Elections 2026
Election Results 2026 Live Updates: Who's ahead in which state
West Bengal Election Results 2026 Live Updates
TN Election Result 2026 Live Updates
Second reaction
But his second reaction came three days later. The same statement began to shift in meaning. What initially felt like an insult gradually turned into clarity. He described it as one of the most freeing realisations of his career, not because it diminished his value, but because it removed a psychological weight that many professionals unknowingly carry.He explained that one of the uncomfortable truths in any career is that organisations continue to function regardless of individual presence. A company exists before an employee joins and continues long after they leave. This is not a cynical observation in his view, but a structural reality of how workplaces operate. Recognising this helps separate personal worth from organisational roles.
Loyalty not tied to growth
He also reflected on how loyalty, when not tied to growth, can quietly become a liability. Staying in a role purely out of commitment, without personal development, can create what he described as a hidden cost over time. In such situations, loyalty does not necessarily translate into progress and instead may slow down professional evolution.Identity based on job titles
Another key point he highlighted was the fragile nature of job-based identity. Titles such as AVP or any other designation can change overnight due to restructuring or organisational shifts. When that happens, the question becomes not just about career position, but about self-definition beyond the role itself. For him, this realisation helped decouple identity from designation.Hard work= indispensable?
He also challenged a common assumption in workplaces that working harder automatically makes someone indispensable. In his reflection, consistent high performance often leads to increased responsibility rather than exclusivity or immunity. Reliable professionals are trusted with more work, but that does not always translate into being irreplaceable or significantly better rewarded.Replacement is natural
He further pointed out that every replacement in a role eventually performs adequately, which reinforces the idea that job functions are designed to be transferable. This, he noted, is not personal criticism but simply how systems are structured in business environments.How he shifted his mindset
From these realisations, he outlined the shift in mindset that followed. Instead of performing loyalty, he began prioritising personal and professional growth. Each role began to be evaluated based on whether it contributed to development rather than comfort or familiarity. If growth was absent, he felt more comfortable moving on without emotional hesitation.Building skills
He also began focusing on building skills that were independent of any single organisation. The emphasis shifted to creating capabilities that would remain relevant even if job titles or companies changed. Alongside this, he started detaching his identity from his job role, viewing work as an important chapter rather than the entire story.Accepting replaceability
This shift also changed how he approached negotiations and workplace dynamics. Accepting replaceability, in his view, also brought awareness that organisations themselves operate in competitive environments. This perspective allowed him to engage in professional discussions with more confidence and less fear.He concluded that many high achievers operate under an unspoken fear of being replaceable, regardless of whether they come from IIT, ISB, or any prestigious background. Once that fear is acknowledged and accepted, its influence begins to weaken. What remains is a clearer focus on growth, autonomy, and long-term self-directed career building, rather than validation through titles alone.
