Trade can be weaponised as a coercive tool of policy, either to force another government to change course or to change its internal calculus when making choices.
That last part is useful to bear in mind: government decisions are the result of an equation with many variables. When we dismiss the leaders of unfriendly regimes as erratic or insane, we’re often simply misunderstanding the variables their decision-making equation contains, or the weights they are attaching to them. A paranoid leader may consider even the rumour of an emerging threat to be a prime concern, a foolish leader may discount credible warnings or chase fantasies, and a greedy or corrupt leader may prioritise personal enrichment above all other questions of governance – yet the equation is still there, and can thus be externally nudged.
How effective trade is at doing this nudging depends on the tools available to the nudger, the equation used by the nudged, and just how big a nudge is being sought. Despite deploying some formidable trade weaponry, the US embargo of Cuba failed to achieve its stated objective of regime change. That’s not entirely surprising. It’s really hard to sanction a country into changing leaders. It’s even harder to...Read more
-
Fears for visitor numbers at proposed city overnight stay tax
-
India reaffirms commitment to boost credibility, compliance in natural diamond sector
-
Drug smuggler arrested in Spain hours after being named among Britain's most wanted
-
Noida authority cuts fuel consumption of official vehicles by 20% amid PM Modi's call for austerity
-
Bruno Fernandes' feelings on assist record speak volumes about Man Utd star
