Top News

CUET PG 2026 Normalization Policy: There has been considerable discussion on social media regarding CUET PG 2026. Candidates have been questioning why the exams for certain select subjects were held on multiple dates. Furthermore, there was apprehension among candidates about whether the results would be determined using a 'normalization' process, given the exams took place on different days. To resolve this confusion, the NTA has issued a clarification.

The NTA stated on social media that during the exams in March 2026, several candidates were unable to appear for the test at the scheduled time due to law-and-order issues in Tura, Meghalaya, and security concerns at certain overseas centers. A total of 565 candidates across 28 subjects missed the exam through no fault of their own. Prioritizing student welfare, the agency conducted a re-examination for these 565 candidates on March 29 and 30, 2026. Here is the NTA's formula regarding the CUET results.

CUET PG 2026: What is the real reason for not using normalization?
The NTA has clarified that its policy for the CUET PG exam is very clear: every CUET PG candidate is awarded 'absolute marks.' There is no normalization of marks at any stage, whether for the main exam or the rescheduled exam. Consequently, candidates appearing for the re-examination were not granted any special concessions or distinct advantages. Everyone is being evaluated on a uniform and fair basis.

Why would the normalization calculation fail?

The National Testing Agency explained, citing data, that the number of candidates taking the re-examination was so small compared to the main exam that applying statistical normalization would be both meaningless and impossible.

For example:
English: Approximately 16,000 candidates appeared for the main exam, whereas only 120 took the paper during the re-examination. Political Science: There were approximately 26,000 candidates in the main examination, whereas only 100 appeared for the rescheduled test.

History: There were over 13,600 candidates in the main examination, while fewer than 80 took the re-examination.

The NTA maintains that it is not feasible to derive a normalization formula by comparing a small group of merely 80 or 100 students with a vast group of thousands of students.

Was the difficulty level of the re-conducted paper different?
Candidates also wondered whether the papers administered later were easier or more difficult. Addressing this, the NTA assured that the question papers used for the re-examination had been prepared and approved by subject experts beforehand. Experts had formally certified that the difficulty level of these papers was exactly on par with that of the main examination papers. Therefore, there is no scope for any injustice towards any candidate.

The score for every CUET PG 2026 candidate is being determined based entirely on equivalent and actual marks. Conducting the re-examination has not altered the scoring pattern.

Disclaimer: This content has been sourced and edited from News18 Hindi. While we have made modifications for clarity and presentation, the original content belongs to its respective authors and website. We do not claim ownership of the content.