Summary
- In a recent interview, Trehan revealed that the actor and singer made the decision after listening to the script and learning more about the life of Jaswant Singh Khalra, the human rights activist whose story inspired the film.
- While the reason behind its removal has drawn attention, Trehan’s comments about Diljit’s symbolic payment have also sparked admiration from fans, many of whom have praised the actor for placing the story and its historical significance above financial gain.
- Diljit’s decision has been widely viewed as a gesture of respect for Khalra’s legacy, highlighting the actor’s emotional connection with the film and his commitment to honouring the memory of a figure whose work continues to be remembered years after his death.
AI Generated Summary
In a recent interview, Trehan revealed that the actor and singer made the decision after listening to the script and learning more about the life of Jaswant Singh Khalra, the human rights activist whose story inspired the film.
The director said Diljit became emotional after hearing the screenplay and seeing Khalra’s photograph. Deeply moved by the subject, the actor reportedly felt that accepting a regular acting fee for portraying such an influential personality would not be appropriate.
Trehan explained that Diljit believed it would be wrong to profit from a project centred on a man who dedicated his life to exposing human rights violations. As a result, he chose to accept only ₹1 as a symbolic payment instead of his usual remuneration.
According to the filmmaker, he tried to persuade Diljit to accept a proper fee for his work. However, the actor remained firm in his decision and agreed to receive only one rupee so that the legal formalities of the contract could be completed.
Trehan also praised Diljit’s professionalism throughout the production. He said the actor remained fully committed to the project and supported the team at every stage of filming. Even when the shooting schedule faced delays, Diljit reportedly never complained and continued to cooperate with the cast and crew.
The director added that the actor’s dedication extended beyond his performance on screen. His attitude on set reflected his respect for the subject matter and the real-life legacy of Jaswant Singh Khalra, making him an important part of the film’s journey.
Sutlej has recently returned to the spotlight for another reason. The film was removed from the ZEE5 streaming platform just two days after its release, leading to widespread discussion among viewers and industry observers. While the reason behind its removal has drawn attention, Trehan’s comments about Diljit’s symbolic payment have also sparked admiration from fans, many of whom have praised the actor for placing the story and its historical significance above financial gain.
Diljit’s decision has been widely viewed as a gesture of respect for Khalra’s legacy, highlighting the actor’s emotional connection with the film and his commitment to honouring the memory of a figure whose work continues to be remembered years after his death.
We welcome your contributions! Submit your blogs, opinion pieces, press releases, news story pitches, and news features to opinion@minutemirror.com.pk and minutemirrormail@gmail.com
-
Manuel Ugarte Undergoes Successful Knee Surgery as Manchester United Face Midfield Challenge
-
Today’s young generation dislikes shaking hands! You will be surprised to know the reason
-
I Tried 5 Ways To Keep Coriander Fresh. Here’s The One That Actually Worked
-
18 carat gold… designed in Italy, this is the history of FIFA World Cup trophy
-
FIFA Closing Ceremony: Shakira, Tom Cruise and BTS will be seen in glory, decades of tradition will be broken in the FIFA finals
