Top News

If you are considering investing in mutual funds, you will often encounter two options: Direct plans and Regular plans. They seem similar because the money goes into the same fund and is managed by the same fund manager. So, why is there a difference in their returns? The simple reason lies in expenses and commissions. Let us explain this in detail.

What is the difference between Direct and Regular plans?
Imagine you want to buy a product. You can either go to a shop and buy it directly or seek the help of an agent. If you buy through an agent, you have to pay them a fee for their services.

Something similar happens with mutual funds.
In a Regular plan, the investor invests through a bank, an agent, or a mutual fund distributor. In return, the distributor receives a commission. This cost is included in the fund's total expenses. On the other hand, in a Direct plan, the investor invests directly with the fund company. There is no distributor commission involved, so the cost is generally lower.

What is the expense ratio?
Mutual fund companies incur certain costs to manage your money and operate the fund; this is known as the expense ratio. In a Direct plan, there is no intermediary—or distributor—so no commission needs to be paid. Consequently, the expense ratio for a Direct plan is usually lower than that of a Regular plan.

Initially, a difference of 0.5% or 1% might seem insignificant. However, if you invest for 10, 15, or 20 years, this small difference can grow into a substantial amount. This is due to the power of compounding—meaning your earnings generate further returns.

Why is there a difference in the NAV?
NAV stands for the Net Asset Value, or the price of a single unit of the mutual fund. Although both plans invest in the same fund, the Regular plan incurs slightly higher expenses. As a result, over time, its NAV may remain lower compared to the Direct plan. This is why, when comparing the Direct and Regular options of the same fund over the long term, their NAVs appear different.

Is a Direct plan always better? A direct plan is not necessarily the right choice for everyone. If you have the knowledge to select mutual funds, understand the associated risks, and manage your investments independently, a direct plan could be beneficial for you.

However, if you are a new investor and are unsure which fund is right for you, seeking the help of a qualified financial advisor can be useful. If you require advice, make sure to understand the associated fees and services beforehand.

How do you invest in a direct plan?
To opt for a direct plan, you can use the official website of the respective mutual fund company or a trusted platform that offers direct plans. When investing, ensure you select the 'Direct Plan' rather than the 'Regular Plan.' If you are filling out a physical form, make sure to correctly select the direct plan option.

Caution when buying mutual funds through banks
Many people assume that purchasing funds directly via a bank's website or mobile app equates to a direct plan, but this is not always the case. Many banks and distributors offer mutual funds through regular plans. Therefore, before investing, check whether the fund is a direct plan or a regular plan alongside its name.

Which one should you choose?
If you can gather information independently and wish to make your own investment decisions, a direct plan could be a good option due to its lower costs. Conversely, if you need assistance in selecting or managing your investments, the services provided through a regular plan might be more useful to you.

Most importantly, do not base your decision solely on higher returns. Consider the fund's risk, expenses, your financial goals, and the investment tenure. Mutual fund investments are subject to market risks; therefore, make a decision based on your specific needs before investing.

Disclaimer: This content has been sourced and edited from TV9. While we have made modifications for clarity and presentation, the original content belongs to its respective authors and website. We do not claim ownership of the content.