The Supreme Court has stayed the reinstatement of IAS officer Rinku Dhugga. She was compulsorily retired by the Centre following the 2022 controversy over the alleged emptying of Delhi’s Thyagaraj Stadium to facilitate her dog-walking.
The Supreme Court has stayed the reinstatement of IAS officer Rinku Dhugga, who was compulsorily retired by the Centre following the 2022 controversy over the alleged emptying of Delhi’s Thyagaraj Stadium to facilitate her dog-walking.
A bench of Chief Justice of India Surya Kant and Justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana issued notice to Dhugga on the Centre’s challenge to the Delhi High Court judgment that upheld the Central Administrative Tribunal’s (CAT) order directing her reinstatement. “In the meantime, the reinstatement of the respondent shall remain stayed,” the bench said in its September 7 order. The matter has been listed for further hearing on October 13.
Background of the Legal Battle
Dhugga had challenged her compulsory retirement before the CAT, which ordered her reinstatement. The Delhi High Court subsequently upheld the CAT’s decision in its April 15 judgment.
The controversy arose in 2022 following allegations that Dhugga and her husband, also an IAS officer, had the Thyagaraj Stadium vacated so she could walk her dog. The allegations drew widespread public attention after photographs and media reports of the incident surfaced.
High Court's Rationale for Reinstatement
The High Court noted that the stadium-related incident had resulted in a minor punishment in disciplinary proceedings. It also considered an allegation concerning Dhugga’s unauthorised absence, both of which had been cited in connection with the decision to compulsorily retire her.
However, the High Court held that the review committee’s recommendation could not be sustained as it had failed to consider several relevant aspects of her service record, including the absence of adverse remarks in her Annual Performance Appraisal Reports, her outstanding grading in preceding years and the fact that she was being considered for promotion.
The High Court further observed that compulsory retirement is intended to remove officers considered “deadwood” from service and held that the principle did not apply to Dhugga’s case. (ANI)
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by Asianetnews Editorial staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)-
Real Betis defender Marc Bartra reveals 'rehearsed' penalty move that stopped Kylian Mbappe in Real Madrid's shock loss
-
Manchester United’s prospects of signing Alejandro Balde rise as Barcelona defender still awaits first minutes
-
Jose Mourinho handed a sprinkler: Why the Real Madrid boss received a bizarre gift before Inter clash
-
Premier League goalkeepers ranked: David Raya remains the benchmark as Alisson sits surprisingly low
-
Liu Yifei sparks debate over cropping ‘Kylie Jenner of Vietnam’ Ho Ngoc Ha out of shared photo
