The Supreme Court on Thursday said it would first hear arguments on the issue of maintainability of petitions seeking a review of its 2022 verdict that upheld the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) powers to arrest, attach properties involved in money laundering and carry out search and seizure under the PMLA.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh noted that the ED has proposed three preliminary issues that primarily deal with the question of the review petitions' maintainability.
The bench said the review petitioners have proposed 13 questions for its consideration.
"Since the proposed issues are arising in the review proceedings, we propose to firstly hear the parties on the issue of maintainability of the review petitions, followed by the hearing on the questions proposed to be raised on behalf of the review petitioners," the bench said.
It said eventually, the questions that might finally arise for consideration would also be determined by the court, if it holds that the review pleas are maintainable.
"They are justified in raising first of all preliminary issues -- whether the review is maintainable. All of us are well aware that review has its own limitations.... Sometimes we can have a different viewpoint but still, we cannot substitute," Justice Kant observed.
The bench posted the matter for hearing on August 6.
On May 7, the top court had asked the parties to frame the issues to be adjudicated in the matter.
The Centre had contended that the hearing of the review petitions cannot go beyond the two specific issues flagged by the apex court bench that issued notices on the petitions in August 2022.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had said the bench, which considered the review petitions for admission in August 2022, issued notices only on two aspects -- the supply of the ECIR copy to the accused and the reversal of the burden of proof under section 24 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
The apex court had, in July 2022, upheld the ED's powers to arrest, attach properties involved in money laundering and carry out search and seizure under the PMLA.
Observing that money laundering is a "threat" to the good functioning of a financial system the world over, the apex court had upheld the validity of certain provisions of the PMLA, underlining that it is not an "ordinary offence".
The top court had said authorities under the 2002 law are "not police officers as such" and the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) cannot be equated with an FIR under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
The supply of an ECIR copy in every case to the person concerned is not mandatory and it is enough if the ED, at the time of the arrest, disclosed the grounds for it, the top court had added.
The 2022 verdict came on a batch of more than 200 petitions questioning various provisions of the PMLA, a law the opposition often claims is weaponised by the government to harass its political adversaries.
The apex court had said that section 45 of the PMLA, which deals with offences to be cognisable and non-bailable and has twin conditions for bail, is reasonable and does not suffer from the vice of arbitrariness or unreasonableness.
A bench of Justices Surya Kant, Ujjal Bhuyan and N Kotiswar Singh noted that the ED has proposed three preliminary issues that primarily deal with the question of the review petitions' maintainability.
The bench said the review petitioners have proposed 13 questions for its consideration.
"Since the proposed issues are arising in the review proceedings, we propose to firstly hear the parties on the issue of maintainability of the review petitions, followed by the hearing on the questions proposed to be raised on behalf of the review petitioners," the bench said.
It said eventually, the questions that might finally arise for consideration would also be determined by the court, if it holds that the review pleas are maintainable.
"They are justified in raising first of all preliminary issues -- whether the review is maintainable. All of us are well aware that review has its own limitations.... Sometimes we can have a different viewpoint but still, we cannot substitute," Justice Kant observed.
The bench posted the matter for hearing on August 6.
On May 7, the top court had asked the parties to frame the issues to be adjudicated in the matter.
The Centre had contended that the hearing of the review petitions cannot go beyond the two specific issues flagged by the apex court bench that issued notices on the petitions in August 2022.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta had said the bench, which considered the review petitions for admission in August 2022, issued notices only on two aspects -- the supply of the ECIR copy to the accused and the reversal of the burden of proof under section 24 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA).
The apex court had, in July 2022, upheld the ED's powers to arrest, attach properties involved in money laundering and carry out search and seizure under the PMLA.
Observing that money laundering is a "threat" to the good functioning of a financial system the world over, the apex court had upheld the validity of certain provisions of the PMLA, underlining that it is not an "ordinary offence".
The top court had said authorities under the 2002 law are "not police officers as such" and the Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) cannot be equated with an FIR under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).
The supply of an ECIR copy in every case to the person concerned is not mandatory and it is enough if the ED, at the time of the arrest, disclosed the grounds for it, the top court had added.
The 2022 verdict came on a batch of more than 200 petitions questioning various provisions of the PMLA, a law the opposition often claims is weaponised by the government to harass its political adversaries.
The apex court had said that section 45 of the PMLA, which deals with offences to be cognisable and non-bailable and has twin conditions for bail, is reasonable and does not suffer from the vice of arbitrariness or unreasonableness.
