Top News

Property Rules: Decisions regarding property within a family often lead to disputes. Can a father transfer all his property to his elder son without informing his younger son? Learn what the law says in such cases.

Property Rules: In India, most property disputes occur within families, especially when parents transfer their property to one child, and the others find out later. The most common question in such cases is whether a father can transfer all his property to his elder son without informing his younger son. Is this legally valid, or do the other children also have equal rights?

It matters whether the property was purchased with the father's own earnings or is ancestral property. The law views both types of properties differently, and the rules change accordingly. Therefore, before reaching any conclusion, it is essential to understand the type of property and who has the right to it. Learn what the law says.

Can a father transfer property to his elder son without informing the younger son?

If the property was purchased by the father with his own earnings, i.e., it is self-acquired property, then the law gives him the full right to transfer it to anyone he wishes. In such a case, the father can transfer the property to his elder son, daughter, wife, or any other person without informing his younger son. He can do this through a gift deed, will, or sale deed.

In this situation, the younger son does not automatically get any legal right unless it is proven that the documents were created under duress, through fraud, or when the father was not mentally stable. Until then, the transfer will be considered completely valid. Clearly, in the case of self-acquired property, the father's decision is final.

What if it is ancestral property?

If the property is ancestral, meaning it has been passed down through several generations and in which children have a right from birth, then the father cannot make a decision on it alone. In ancestral property, every son and daughter has an equal share. In such a situation, the father cannot transfer the entire property to the elder son without the younger son's consent. He only has rights over his own share.

If the father transfers more than his share of the property, the younger son can challenge it in court. In such cases, the court examines the documents, property records, and the history of family partitions to determine whether the transfer is valid. Therefore, making a decision entirely in favor of one child regarding ancestral property is not considered legally sound.