Delhi High Court judge Justice Swarnakanta Sharma refused to recuse herself from hearing the case.
The High Court dismissed the petitions filed by Kejriwal and other accused.
“Recusal could have been an easy way out, a simple escape route. But this court understands that the dignity of a judge’s office demands restraint and silence. However, such silence should not be of a nature that harms the judicial institution itself. Every allegation raises a question mark on the judiciary as a collective institution.”
Judge’s Remarks On Allegations
“The allegations made and the relationships referred to were not relevant to the issues in this case. These proceedings were used to try to build a narrative in the media. This court has decided the matter without any pressure and with complete impartiality.”
On Refusing To Step Aside
“The position of a judge demands detachment from oneself. It would have been like surrender if I had abandoned my responsibility without hearing the application. That would have been the easier path, because then no one would have said anything about me or my family. But in the interest of the institution, it is not right for me to give up my responsibility without delivering a decision.”
-
No, RBI Has Not Allowed Exchange of Old ₹500 or ₹1000 Notes: Viral WhatsApp Claim Debunked

-
Planning a Foreign Trip Without PAN or Taxable Income? New Rule May Require Filing Form 157

-
PM Kisan 23rd Installment: Expected Date, Eligibility, and How Farmers Can Apply Online

-
Will Indian Banks Shift to a 5-Day Work Week? Here’s the Latest Update on Weekend Holiday Demand

-
TDS on Property Above ₹50 Lakh? ITAT Ruling Brings Big Relief for Select Homebuyers
