Top News

Investors who began their mutual fund investments during the stock market peak of September 2024 have witnessed sharply different outcomes depending on where and how they invested. While lump sum investors largely struggled with losses, many Systematic Investment Plan (SIP) investors managed to limit the damage — and in some cases even earned strong returns, especially in mid-cap and small-cap funds.

The findings highlight an important lesson for investors: timing matters, but the investment method can be just as crucial as the category you choose.

What Happened After the Market Peak?

Indian equity markets touched record highs on September 26, 2024, when both the Sensex and Nifty reached all-time peaks. However, the momentum did not last long. Markets later entered a prolonged correction phase that impacted investors across categories.

According to the report, the Sensex has already declined nearly 9.4 percent so far in 2026 and remains over 4 percent lower compared to the previous year.

This naturally raises a key question: What happened to investors who started investing exactly at the top of the market?

To understand this, analysts compared two approaches:

• A monthly SIP of ₹10,000 started at the market peak
• A lump sum investment of ₹2 lakh made at the same time

The comparison across large-cap, mid-cap, and small-cap funds revealed major differences in investor outcomes.

Large Cap Funds: Stability but Limited Gains

Large-cap mutual funds delivered relatively stable performance, but returns remained modest for most SIP investors.

Among the better-performing schemes, the Bank of India Large Cap Fund generated nearly 4.4 percent XIRR through SIP investments. A total investment of ₹2 lakh reportedly grew to around ₹2.07 lakh.

A few other schemes, including Taurus Large Cap Fund and Quant Large Cap Fund, delivered marginal gains in the range of 1–2 percent. However, beyond these funds, the overall picture became weaker.

Several large-cap funds barely managed to avoid losses, while others delivered negative returns despite continuous monthly investing. The SIP return for the Nifty 50 TRI was also reported near minus 2 percent, reflecting the difficult market environment.

Some investors even suffered losses between 4 and 5.5 percent in certain schemes. Still, SIPs helped reduce the overall impact of the downturn compared to one-time investing.

Lump Sum Investments Faced Bigger Damage

The comparison became more striking in the case of lump sum investments.

Investors who deployed ₹2 lakh in one go during the market peak reportedly faced significantly deeper losses. Even relatively stronger schemes like Motilal Oswal Large Cap Fund remained in negative territory.

Most large-cap lump sum investments saw declines of 2–4 percent, while in some cases losses climbed close to 8 percent.

This clearly demonstrated the difference between staggered investing through SIPs and investing a large amount at a single market level.

Mid Cap Funds Delivered Better SIP Results

Mid-cap mutual funds painted a much stronger picture for SIP investors.

According to the analysis, ICICI Prudential Midcap Fund generated nearly 17 percent XIRR for SIP investors. A ₹2 lakh investment through monthly contributions reportedly grew to more than ₹2.27 lakh.

Other schemes such as HSBC Midcap Fund also delivered returns exceeding 14 percent. Several mid-cap funds generated returns in the 8–9 percent range, outperforming the Nifty Midcap 150 TRI benchmark, which delivered around 7.1 percent returns.

However, the category also showed wide performance gaps between funds. Some schemes generated only around 1 percent returns, while others delivered losses close to 9 percent.

Mid Cap Lump Sum Investments Were Mixed

Unlike large caps, lump sum investments in mid-cap funds did not completely disappoint investors.

ICICI Prudential Midcap Fund reportedly generated around 5.4 percent returns even through lump sum investing. WOC Mid Cap Fund and HSBC Midcap Fund also managed modest gains of 2–3 percent.

Still, weaker schemes posted losses between 7 and 9.5 percent, proving that fund selection remained extremely important in the mid-cap space.

Small Cap Funds Showed the Widest Gap

The difference between successful and unsuccessful investments became even more pronounced in small-cap mutual funds.

Union Small Cap Fund emerged among the stronger performers with approximately 13.4 percent XIRR through SIP investing. Several other funds delivered returns in the 9–10 percent range.

These returns significantly outperformed the Nifty Smallcap 250 TRI benchmark, which delivered roughly 3 percent returns during the same period.

However, the risk factor remained equally high. Some small-cap schemes posted losses approaching 9.5 percent despite regular SIP investments.

Lump Sum Investing in Small Caps Was Highly Risky

The risk associated with lump sum investing became most visible in small-cap funds.

Even the best-performing lump sum investment reportedly generated returns of only around 2 percent. Most other schemes either stayed flat or slipped into negative territory.

In several cases, investor losses touched nearly 13 percent. The Nifty Smallcap 250 TRI benchmark itself declined more than 5 percent during this period.

Key Lessons for Investors

The overall analysis offers a strong reminder that market timing alone does not determine investment success.

Investors who used SIPs were generally better protected from severe market corrections because their investments were spread across multiple market levels. SIPs helped reduce downside risk and, in many cases, generated healthy gains — particularly in mid-cap and small-cap categories.

On the other hand, lump sum investments proved far more dependent on entry timing. Investors who entered the market with large one-time amounts near the peak experienced heavier losses in most categories.

The data also showed that as investors move from large-cap to small-cap funds, the performance gap between strong and weak schemes widens significantly. This makes fund selection increasingly important in higher-risk categories.

For long-term investors, the findings reinforce why disciplined investing through SIPs is often considered a safer strategy during volatile market phases.