Top News

With Press Note 2 (PN2) of 2026, India has rewritten rules of the game for capital flowing from China and other land- bordering neighbours. The amendment reframes the 2020-era national security cordon from a blanket quarantine to a calibrated filter that distinguishes control from mere capital.

It is a pivotal move in India's long experiment with 'securonomics', embedding geopolitical risk into investment policy without choking growth. The starting point remains PN3 of 2020, issued at the height of the pandemic and escalating border tensions with China. That measure shifted all investments from entities in, or beneficial owners from, countries sharing a land border with India from the automatic route to the government approval route, regardless of sector, stake or size. It also extended the approval net to indirect and beneficial ownership.

The result was predictable: Chinese-origin FDI came to a halt. Between 2014 and March 2020, Chinese FDI into India rose from approx $404 mn to $2.3 bn, and flows from Hong Kong increased from $1.2 bn to $4.4 bn.

After 2020 restrictions and accompanying security clearances, investments from both places dwindled to around 0.34% of total FDI between April 2020 and March 2024. The recent PN2 amends paragraph 3.1.1 of the FDI policy, but does not repeal the core security architecture of PN3.

An entity or citizen from a land-border country, or an investment where the 'beneficial owner' is from such a country, still falls under the government approval route. The safeguard requiring prior approval for any transfer resulting in such beneficial ownership has also been retained. The actual liberalisation lies in the revised definition of 'beneficial owner' and procedural clarity.

PN2 imports the definition of 'beneficial owner' from Section 2(1)(fa) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) 2002, along with thresholds and tests contained in Rule 9(3) of PMLA Maintenance of Records Rules 2005. This replaces the earlier near-zero-tolerance standard, under which even nominal Chinese exposure in an offshore investment fund could push the entire structure into the approval route.

PN2 clarifies when beneficial ownership will be construed to vest in a land-border country, namely where citizens or entities from such countries cross PMLA thresholds of 10%, exercise control, or hold ultimate effective control over either the investor or the Indian investee. The real innovation of PN2 is not the 10% threshold but the decision to outsource the most contested concept in FDI regulations, viz, beneficial ownership, to an anti-money laundering statute.

PMLA tests are detailed and multifactorial. They examine shareholding, control rights and ultimate effective control. The new approach corrects the earlier regulatory overreach, but it also assumes that Indian regulators will possess the analytical capacity to pierce complex offshore fund structures quickly enough to police circumvention. That's a tall order when applications in sensitive sectors are expected to be processed within 60 days.

The strategic logic behind PN2 is as much economic as geopolitical. India's trade deficit with China crossed $100 bn between April 2025 and March 2026, touching about $112 bn, even as Chinese-origin FDI into India remained negligible. From electronic components and telecom equipment to machinery and APIs, India remains structurally dependent on Chinese goods.

So, the 2020 FDI policy created a paradox: India continued to import heavily from China while constraining Chinese capital that could have potentially helped localise manufacturing and move India higher up the global technology value chain. By reopening the door selectively, the new framework attempts to rebalance this equation.

Industry participants suggest that easing Chinese FDI restrictions could benefit consumer electronics, technology startups, power equipment and infrastructure, and emerging sectors like EVs and solar components by enabling partnerships for technology access and capacity building. Manufacturing, technology and infrastructure are similarly expected to benefit, as non-controlling stakes may now proceed without bespoke security vetting, subject to ordinary sectoral rules.

PN2 seemingly is less a concession to China than a signalling device to global capital, and another step towards India's ambition of increasing annual FDI inflows to $100 bn. By restoring the automatic route for clearly non-controlling stakes, India is signalling to international investors that neighbour-linked capital will now be assessed through a risk-based lens rather than a blanket presumption of hostility, underlining that this is not a return to the pre-2020 status quo.